Go Back   Video Games Forum - Free Online Arcade and Gaming Forum > Gaming Newsgroups From Microsoft > Microsoft Newsgroup Forums > Simulation Games

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-31-2005, 03:50 AM
leo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A century of flight


Hi, I have a toshiba Portege 2000 with Trident Cyberblade video card and I have the same proble. Drivers updated, DirectX 9.0c, but still video card not recognised by fs2004 and everything works under software acceleration, which is impossible to play with. I tried also other drivers for the videocard, but nothing. Did u managed to make it work?


--
leo

------------------------------------------------------------------------
View this thread: http://www.game-tricks.net/viewtopic-176628.html

Send from http://www.game-tricks.net

Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-03-2005, 11:53 AM
Rob R. Ainscough
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A century of flight

Are you serious??

You'd be lucky to play solitaire on that laptop. Come on leo, Pentium III
750Mhz 256MB RAM 16MB video card and you think this should work on a flight
simulation program?? If you read the side of the box for FS2004 or if you
read the Readme for FS2004, you'll notice that your laptop does NOT meet the
minimum requirements to run FS2004.

That laptop is almost 4 years old.

Rob


"leo" <leo.1xrbf3@no-mx.game-tricks.net> wrote in message
news:leo.1xrbf3@no-mx.game-tricks.net...
>
> Hi, I have a toshiba Portege 2000 with Trident Cyberblade video card and I
> have the same proble. Drivers updated, DirectX 9.0c, but still video card
> not recognised by fs2004 and everything works under software acceleration,
> which is impossible to play with. I tried also other drivers for the
> videocard, but nothing. Did u managed to make it work?
>
>
> --
> leo
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> View this thread: http://www.game-tricks.net/viewtopic-176628.html
>
> Send from http://www.game-tricks.net
>



Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-03-2005, 03:03 PM
RobertVA
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A century of flight

Rob R. Ainscough wrote:
> Are you serious??
>
> You'd be lucky to play solitaire on that laptop. Come on leo, Pentium III
> 750Mhz 256MB RAM 16MB video card and you think this should work on a flight
> simulation program?? If you read the side of the box for FS2004 or if you
> read the Readme for FS2004, you'll notice that your laptop does NOT meet the
> minimum requirements to run FS2004.
>
> That laptop is almost 4 years old.
>
> Rob
>
>
> "leo" <leo.1xrbf3@no-mx.game-tricks.net> wrote in message
> news:leo.1xrbf3@no-mx.game-tricks.net...
>
>>Hi, I have a toshiba Portege 2000 with Trident Cyberblade video card and I
>>have the same proble. Drivers updated, DirectX 9.0c, but still video card
>>not recognised by fs2004 and everything works under software acceleration,
>>which is impossible to play with. I tried also other drivers for the
>>videocard, but nothing. Did u managed to make it work?
>>
>>
>>--
>>leo
>>
>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>View this thread: http://www.game-tricks.net/viewtopic-176628.html
>>
>>Send from http://www.game-tricks.net
>>



Rob A., what box are you reading? My "collector's tin box says 128 MB
main RAM (with XP OS. 64 MB for 98/ME)450 Mhz CPU with 8 MB on a DirectX
9 video card. I realize thst configuration doesn't permit high scenery
or AI aircraft settings, but it DOES work. Don't even BEGIN to claim it
doesn't, because I can run FS 2004 on my 450 Mhz Pentium III. Frame
rates can be on the low side in high detail areas like Seatac, but video
acceleration DOES work with its ATI Rage 128 video card. I don't have
the settings so low that it looks like FS 98 either (and I HAVE run FS
versions 95 through 2004 on that machine). Funny when the frame rates on
the earlier versions are so high the frame rate counter can't display
enough digits!

BTW, I normally run FS 2004 on a more powerfull system. I haven't
downloaded the noCD patch, so the original CD #4 follows the simulator
around to wherever I'm running it.

If Leo is short on hardware it could only be the compatability of his
particular video accelerator and/or driver with DirectX 9. Running the
video and sound tests in the DirectX diagnostic (DXDIAG) probably
wouldn't hurt.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-04-2005, 12:53 PM
Rob R. Ainscough
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A century of flight

mine says 16MB, but regardless -- these posts just get silly after a while

"RobertVA" <robert_c72AThotmail@invalid.com> wrote in message
news:ewOYo3K4FHA.2424@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Rob R. Ainscough wrote:
>> Are you serious??
>>
>> You'd be lucky to play solitaire on that laptop. Come on leo, Pentium
>> III 750Mhz 256MB RAM 16MB video card and you think this should work on a
>> flight simulation program?? If you read the side of the box for FS2004
>> or if you read the Readme for FS2004, you'll notice that your laptop does
>> NOT meet the minimum requirements to run FS2004.
>>
>> That laptop is almost 4 years old.
>>
>> Rob
>>
>>
>> "leo" <leo.1xrbf3@no-mx.game-tricks.net> wrote in message
>> news:leo.1xrbf3@no-mx.game-tricks.net...
>>
>>>Hi, I have a toshiba Portege 2000 with Trident Cyberblade video card and
>>>I have the same proble. Drivers updated, DirectX 9.0c, but still video
>>>card not recognised by fs2004 and everything works under software
>>>acceleration, which is impossible to play with. I tried also other
>>>drivers for the videocard, but nothing. Did u managed to make it work?
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>leo
>>>
>>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>View this thread: http://www.game-tricks.net/viewtopic-176628.html
>>>
>>>Send from http://www.game-tricks.net
>>>

>
>
> Rob A., what box are you reading? My "collector's tin box says 128 MB main
> RAM (with XP OS. 64 MB for 98/ME)450 Mhz CPU with 8 MB on a DirectX 9
> video card. I realize thst configuration doesn't permit high scenery or AI
> aircraft settings, but it DOES work. Don't even BEGIN to claim it doesn't,
> because I can run FS 2004 on my 450 Mhz Pentium III. Frame rates can be on
> the low side in high detail areas like Seatac, but video acceleration DOES
> work with its ATI Rage 128 video card. I don't have the settings so low
> that it looks like FS 98 either (and I HAVE run FS versions 95 through
> 2004 on that machine). Funny when the frame rates on the earlier versions
> are so high the frame rate counter can't display enough digits!
>
> BTW, I normally run FS 2004 on a more powerfull system. I haven't
> downloaded the noCD patch, so the original CD #4 follows the simulator
> around to wherever I'm running it.
>
> If Leo is short on hardware it could only be the compatability of his
> particular video accelerator and/or driver with DirectX 9. Running the
> video and sound tests in the DirectX diagnostic (DXDIAG) probably wouldn't
> hurt.



Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Clicky
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:44 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©1999-2008, Bluegoop.

A vBSkinworks Design


SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0