Which country is the biggest threat? - Page 2 - Video Games Forum

Benson · #11 (**permalink**) 02-23-2003, 07:19 PM

I believe that North Korea is a bigger threat, mainly because they already probably have the weapons, and we know that. Iraq also has the possiblity of having these weapons, but we aren't so sure.

If either country is attacked though, it would mean problems for the people of that country, Saddam would go nuts because he knows we are after him, and Dr. Evil would just do what he is already doing, and then maybe fire off a few missles.

Coren · #12 (**permalink**) 02-23-2003, 07:24 PM

We are the biggest threat I mean c'mon here's my idea

We send a few people to every country..when they find out that the country doesn't like us we send everyone color TV and basic cable set and make them watch ESPN2 for 5-10 minutes
In that time they will realize that We build Monster trucks...for fun

We build Drag racers that will go 50 miles in 5 seconds because we were bored

Piss us off and see what we build

The Big Nerd · #13 (**permalink**) 02-23-2003, 07:30 PM

North Korea will produce a bomb regardless of what the United States does. This is the world we live in. China has it because the United States and Russia have it. India has it because China has it. Pakistan has it because India has it. The only question is when Japan will build one. Iran is on her way. And in the near future (of course, after Saddam), we will probably be helping Iraq to have atomic power. This is called balance.

Isn’t North Korean leader Kim Jong II as much of a menace to his own people, as well as his neighbors, as Saddam Hussein? Most definitely. Why is Washington leading the world toward war in the Middle East, where Saddam is appearing to allow weapons inspectors free rein, while playing down the threat from the already armed and uncooperative Kim?

In my personal opinion North Korea's impact on this war will certainly create a bigger stirrup than Iraq.

Darth_Faction · #14 (**permalink**) 02-23-2003, 07:40 PM

I don't understand why so many of us are downplaying the things that Saddam Hussein has done, and is most likely still doing, since the 1980's. He is allowing inspectors into his country because he can keep them from finding out what he is doing. Was it not suspicious that he had inspectors removed for 10 years, breaking U.N resolution after U.N. resolution. Oddly enough, the same people who think that they can see into the United States's inherent evil and greed in seeking oil, are naive enough to believe that Saddam Hussein has nothing to hide. He's probably sitting in his large, leather chair in Baghdad laughing, knowing that we "investigative society" of Americans have been fooled once again. That man has committed crimes against nature, a country, and man itself, and we are looking over this to an arrogant moron in North Korea who is in no position to cause as much destruction as Hussein is.

By the way, Big N, please don't go without citing your sources, or in this case, don't plagiarize. Thanks.

The Big Nerd · #15 (**permalink**) 02-23-2003, 07:41 PM

I didn't, I found that from a news source

Darth_Faction · #16 (**permalink**) 02-23-2003, 07:42 PM

Copied from a news source?

I could have sworn I was reading an article that said the same thing. . . .I'll find it if you want?

The Big Nerd · #17 (**permalink**) 02-23-2003, 07:44 PM

Right, I found it froma new source

Darth_Faction · #18 (**permalink**) 02-23-2003, 07:46 PM

Alright, glad we cleared that up.

GunGrave · #19 (**permalink**) 02-23-2003, 11:59 PM

hmm i think both but i guess Iraq is more threat since they are the one who keeps popping out in the news

Dru-Dogma · #20 (**permalink**) 02-24-2003, 05:41 PM

I put Korea, just because they for SURE have nukes...