Ummm, there's a difference between condemming and forcing.
Dur.
Do you not understand that?
There's a diference between saying "Meat is bad for you because it's PROVEN and if you deny that you're an idiot" and saying "Meat is bad for you so I WON'T LET YOU EAT IT ANYMORE."
You have a simplistic mind, and yet, I still love you.

I have no problem with you saying meat has been proven to be bad, but the whole "you are an idiot for denying it" can be left out. Don't patronize me, I'm not simplistic, it's just 2 fucking AM.

__________________
mr bigggshot: wait, are you humoring me?
I couldbe asleep: no
mr bigggshot: shit, and i totally fell for it
mr bigggshot: i need to stop being retarded
:thumbsup:

2:21 and 10 seconds.
*wants sleep*

2:21? That is so three minutes and twenty-seven seconds ago...*passes out*

__________________
mr bigggshot: wait, are you humoring me?
I couldbe asleep: no
mr bigggshot: shit, and i totally fell for it
mr bigggshot: i need to stop being retarded
:thumbsup:

Exactally 2:30:00.
I'm going to sleep.
Night'ee Night.

Jush, the guy in your link has a point.

__________________

Favorite People's list: Holly, Amber, Adam, Dwhitten, Spitz, GTA, Gungrave, homless guy, Transexual, Aka.
:x xero :x

Hahah, Maddox is an idiot. He claims that "A murderer who kills 10 people is no better off than a murderer who kills 20. Of course, from the perspective of a suggestible young vegetarian I'm sure being responsible for half as many murders as the next guy means you're off the hook, right? "
The difference between these two is that if people HAD to, for some reason, "murder," of course it would be better to murder in smaller numbers. Person A has the blood of 20 people on their hands while Person B has 10 people's blood on theirs. Of course, neither can be said to be just, however, Person A has killed 10 more people. For those 10 people (Aparently equatable with farm animals, although I hate this anology) it DOES matter. Those are 10 people who now no longer get to live.
Gah. Also, the point is animals used for slaugher suffer their entire lives, while animals killed in wheat fields suffer for a few seconds. It's still terrible, but is almost unpreventable. This also adds to the anology that Person A tormented all 20 of his victims for their entire lives, since their birth, before the murder. Person B picked his victims randomly and up until their deaths, had lived free, natural lives.
Meh. There ya go.
Now I'm ACTUALLY going to sleep. Shit. It's 3:18. Damn you, Maddox, keeping me up reading you damn site.

haha u should believe adrian cause at most fast food restaurants they dip ur order in grease its disgusting

__________________

Along with french fries as well. I don't give a care either way, there's no way in hell I'm giving up chicken.

__________________

Favorite People's list: Holly, Amber, Adam, Dwhitten, Spitz, GTA, Gungrave, homless guy, Transexual, Aka.
:x xero :x

Adrian what the guy was trying to say is if you kill 10 or 20 people your still a murdered either way. Animals used for slaughter do not suffer there whole lives. Hell they get fed different grains and stuff besides just grass. They get big fields to roam around in, sure theres a fence but damm 200 acres of land isnt enough? Whats the difference between a cow being raised for being slaughter and one being raised in the wild? Oh thats right, there are no cows in the wild. There probably wouldnt be cows if it werent for humans raising them. Oh and in africa there ppl would probably die if it werent for there cattle. They even drink blood from the cows. Call it sick? They dont know that its bad, its actually good for them and its better then starving right, or would you rather them try to live off grass.

__________________