|
|
|
12-15-2004, 08:51 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 437
Rep Power: 255
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lulu
Whoever resists using feeble wilsonian excuses such as sovereignty, autodetermination, or religion, will be strafed, schrapnellized, fuel-air exploded, uranium-ridden, MOABed, maybe fucked with a cop stick in Abu Graib, in short ground to dust. Or at least ashes.
|
Or, perhaps, have their air force destroyed, shot while protesting, or hacked to death with machetes.
__________________
In this country, we don't need reasons to make things legal; we need reasons to make things illegal. - Startup
|
12-15-2004, 09:00 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 437
Rep Power: 255
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bond369
Than US did act unilateraly by far more than any european country with their sience project. Read what tfbm said.
And i limit my definitions to dictionary explanations and not to what would fit me and my wishfull thinking best. Its beyond me why are u so obsessed with finding in europe what isnt there. Well at least your looking in wrong places...
And yes, some countries did act unilateraly during Iraq conflict... they were in the "coalition of the willing" (idiotic term to begin with, shows nothing but which countries would suck up to US and would ignore their own ppl just for that).
|
At first, I was shocked. Then, I realized who I was debating with. Let me post YOUR definition again for you:
"A tendency of nations to conduct their foreign affairs individualistically, characterized by minimal consultation and involvement with other nations, even their allies."
I've bolded the important parts of the definition.
Ahhh, forget it. Let's go back to the easiest maxim: US=Bad, Europe=Good. Meanwhile, Europe can continue to pretend to be important, and the US will continue to make a difference. At least, with my new knowledge, I can see your perpetual tantrums for the farce that they are.
__________________
In this country, we don't need reasons to make things legal; we need reasons to make things illegal. - Startup
|
12-16-2004, 12:57 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 76
Rep Power: 251
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatboy
Or, perhaps, have their air force destroyed, shot while protesting, or hacked to death with machetes.
|
Heh. So what's worse, shooting protesters, or bombing a marriage ceremony ?
I don't quite get the machete part. Give me a break with their "air force", two lousy sukhois, pleeeease...
|
12-16-2004, 03:11 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 104
Rep Power: 244
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatboy
Ahhh, forget it. Let's go back to the easiest maxim: US=Bad, Europe=Good. Meanwhile, Europe can continue to pretend to be important, and the US will continue to make a difference. At least, with my new knowledge, I can see your perpetual tantrums for the farce that they are.
|
Europe does not exist (apart from on a map), so i assume you are talking about the EU, which is just a group of nations that have signed some trade and economic agreements and have themselves organised to be able to discuss somewhat effectively. That you see the EU as a whole means that these countries dont act unilaterally very often and/or that you think in terms of them/US, black/white, "if you're not with us you're against us".
That the EU organisation tries to be important is normal. Every organisation tries to make itself important.
There is no doubt that the US makes a difference. The problem is that they do it with arms, it changes the situation for the worse (apart from for a few oil and arms dealers and their friends) and it destabilizes trust relations of which some have taken more than a century to build. And why, because the Bush has to show the world that he has a bigger dick than his dad. This guy is not leading a nation, he is playing games with his friends, the wanker.
__________________
|
12-16-2004, 05:29 AM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 123
Rep Power: 245
|
|
The president is a very good democratic president, probably one of the best ever.
Until the coming into action of the constitution, it is hard to consider that the democratic eu is able to act unilaterally since their global stance is the result of consultations made accordingly to a set of predetermined rules.
Once the constitution is on, this will be another story since foreign policy is one of the main advances in that new treaty, gathering the whole decisional power in the hands of a few. This mean that soon the democratic eu will be able to act unilaterally , more like a constituted nation rather than a patchwork of nations as it is now.
|
12-16-2004, 07:18 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 0
|
|
i want more money
hey this is off topic but umm how do i cat an animal i wanna play wit it or sumething
|
12-16-2004, 07:19 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 0
|
|
i think it woul dbe cool to hav e a cat or sumething can anyonehelp me?
|
12-16-2004, 07:19 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 0
|
|
im a new member so please be nice :wave:
|
12-16-2004, 07:21 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 0
|
|
im hungry oo donettes :drool:
i normally eat so much i get sick
:beer: cheer mate
|
12-16-2004, 10:15 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 0
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by marlin
@Bond
If you are negiotiating for a year about something in a work group existing of a number of nations, i would call it foreign affairs.
|
I missed your reply...
Foreing affair: Affairs concerning international relations and national interests in foreign countries.
Since is far from it.
Quote:
At first, I was shocked. Then, I realized who I was debating with. Let me post YOUR definition again for you:
"A tendency of nations to conduct their foreign affairs individualistically, characterized by minimal consultation and involvement with other nations, even their allies."
I've bolded the important parts of the definition.
|
A tendency of nations to conduct their foreign affairs individualistically, characterized by minimal consultation and involvement with other nations, even their allies.
Now i bolded important part as well. Now look at my reply at marlin and stop acting like a litle kid. All you do is cry how US = bad, EU =good. No one said its like that... its far from it.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 7 (0 members and 7 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:28 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©1999-2008, Bluegoop.
|
|
|
|