Quote:
|
Originally Posted by zteccc
I guess I didn't ask my question well. What I meant is that in "natural law" there is no such thing as "murder." As such, then there wouldn't be any reason to bother with whether one murder or two were comitted; simply something died. Differentiating that two murders occurred as opposed to one means that the term "murder" is meaningfull in a legal sense, but such a term doesn't appear to exist under the philosophy you've presented. Why then did you bother to make and later justify the argument that killing a pregnant woman would be two murders?
-- Jeff
|
I am not sure Punky has decided fully how he chooses to live his life. He contradicts himself in almost every post. I feel he wants to believe in a "natural law", and live as an anti-socialist, but maybe he is having a difficult time in adapting wholly to that life??
I find many of his comments confusing due to the fact that I am not sure that he is sure of what his beliefs are.