There's actually nothing I can say to your post, punkusmartyrus, that I wish to take the time to say (there's plenty that I could say, but I'm too busy today to get into it). Instead I'll say this. Fare you well in your anarchistic endeavors. I say that knowing that natural law, survival of the fittest and might makes right doesn't leave much room for second place. If one is not always the biggest, strongest, smartest, fastest, etc. then that one will soon be dead or at the mercy of another and in a natural law setting, that mercy will be short lived if it exists at all.

Look at the animal kingdom and the reality of the life of anyone other than the alpha-males of the world. They are slaves to the whims of the strongest, often being denied the basic necessities because of the displeasure of the strongest. A beta wolf doesn't live off the land. He lives off of the leavings of the alpha and only if the alpha is pleased with him. That is natural law, the strongest make the rules (and yes, laws still exist, they just change when leadership changes).

I'm curious, have you been wrongfully accused or suffered such random injustice that you decry? Have you sufered for being part of a nation? What prompted you to follow this philosophy? Note that I'm not saying it is wrong, if this is where you have faith, then good luck with it.

-- Jeff

ps This has gone far afield from the topic of whether a pregnant woman's murder should count as two, so feel free to move it to another thread if you wish. Since I'm on the topic, however, why, based on your philosophy, would you state that the murder of a pregnant mother should be counted as two murders? Since you believe in no laws, such a distinction would be meaningless, wouldn't it?

__________________
"Government is not the solution to our problem, government is the problem." --Ronald Reagan