View Single Post
  #140 (permalink)  
Old 01-02-2005, 07:52 PM
fatboy fatboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 437
Rep Power: 255
fatboy is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bond369
A resolution that would start a war based on fake evidence...
Sigh. No, a resolution that would put Iraq in compliance with the UN. How short our memory is. Sigh.
Quote:
Bullshit. There was no resolution for war so anyone can claim its illegal.
Sure, anyone can claim it's illegal. Anyone can bitch, moan, make threats, and sling insults. But I haven't seen any votes in the UN to sanction the US. I haven't seen any court rule that the US has violated any law. I haven't seen even any one bring this case to a court. Why don't you do it? It obviously bothers you, and you're obviously in the right. Why not teach the US a lesson?
Quote:
So?
So that makes you arrogant and insulting.
Quote:
Wtf is with you and France and Germany?
Their contribution is meaningless since it has close to zero support among population. If US/UK actually found any reason for invasion you would have gotten a LOT larger support as well as lot larger army with wich to go in war.
I don't give a rat fuck what France and Germany do. My point was that there were over 60 nations that sided with the US on this issue. But because France and Germany didn't, the US is accused of acting unilaterally.
Quote:
Ask Bush... hes the one bullshitting about spreading democracy.
You're the one who brought it up. Are you off your rocker or something?
Quote:
Umm no vote at all?
Wasnt there an incident when Rumsfield was bitching about Turkey for not negotiating directly to generals insted of parlament/president. Or something like that...
Is Turkey a democracy?
Quote:
France and some other countries want it in France. They build it in France.
US, Japan, S. Korea, ???, want it in Japan. They build it in Japan.
Problem solved. If 2 sides want to build something and disagree on something than each side has every right to build it by themselfs.
As I've repeatedly said, that is of course the answer. More power to them.
Quote:
How many Europeans did you see bitching at US for "unilateraly" landing on moon?
Actually, I don't think many - though there were probably some. You see, Europe has felt pretty comfortable bashing the US since the USSR fell. You don't have to depend upon us for your security anymore so you're more than happy to shit on us.
Quote:
So world is after US? Thats based on...?
Please. Of course. The US is too powerful, too rich. What else could be the reason? The first Kyoto Protocal would've destroyed our economy. We asked for changes. "Absolutely not!" railed Europe. Then, when we bow out, Europe realizes that she can't even afford what she wanted us to do, so she implements the changes we requested. So, it's "absolutely" okay when the pain is borne by the US, but not okay if the US doesn't suffer.
Quote:
And destruction of enviroment hurts ALL countries, building an experiment hurts NONE.
Right. What if this thing explodes?
Quote:
rofl
So no resolution was passed to attack Iraq, majority of the world followed UN law and didnt attack Iraq, you disreagarded UN law and now your bitching at the world for following laws which you helped to set up?
Also note that you wanted world to attack Iraq based on LIES. No one cares about your lies? Too bad.
So, we were lying that Iraq had broken UN sanctions and resolutions? Can you point me to the source you have that shows Iraq was complying with the UN?
Quote:
EU and some other country(ies)... dunno which since linke to that article is outdated.
There are only 2 choices. EU/... wants it in France, Japan/... wants it in Japan. No progress has been made in 2 years of talking so your suggesting it should stay as it is? Your mad since one side decided to do experiment alone because alternative is NO experiment at all. Oh wait... they can always do what US wants...
Fuck. How many times do I have to tell you I'm not mad? The French are handling this exactly as they should handle it.
Quote:
I dont know if that would happen.
Right.
Quote:
IIRC that article said something about if this is not resolved in near future than they will go for it alone. Nothing about "do it my way, or else". Dont see whats wrong with trying to push things foward.
Oh, kind of like, "Either the UN should force Iraq to comply with its resolutions, or we will." Just trying to push things forward, you know.
__________________
In this country, we don't need reasons to make things legal; we need reasons to make things illegal. - Startup
Reply With Quote