And if you can prove he is responsible for the danger that one person is in? I am still not totally convinced. With strict I ment also only persons responsible for the danger in the first place, limiting methods (no permanent injury for example). Do you treat it as an necessary or unnecessary evil?

But I think you make a very good point and it is probably the best way to handle it, at least in the world we live in now (lately I have not been too optimist about the future).

__________________