Geez, I hope you're right steryos and that this didn't really happen. But I'm confused on how you would explain the pictures. But then again, I think you agree that the demonstration happened (as described in the article), yet you have a complaint against another web site?

While I would have to agree that this sounds an awful lot like a case of "he said, she said", why are you so quick to condemn the author of the piece? Because zealots and idiots read it? I read it a couple times and didn't find any "stupidly repeated... sarcastic quotations". Nor any accusations toward "all the world's muslims for the actions of a few radicalists".

Of course, FrontPageMag is considered a "conservative online magazine". However, does that mean that none of their reporting can be trusted? Is it the same for liberal news sources with obvious liberal bias? None of it is to be trusted? I guess before I dismiss this entire article as "bullshit" I would like at least a little evidence of false reporting. Do you have any?

Let me ask you, do you think it's possible that everything happened exactly as the article alleges? And, if so, would that be okay?

__________________
In this country, we don't need reasons to make things legal; we need reasons to make things illegal. - Startup