Quote:
|
Originally Posted by thedevilf
Well Kerry thinks otherwise..and plus there is something else, its not exactly "USA" which is interested in oil, it is GB, and GB jr. comes back to finish the job and take revenge for GB Senior. And that is what is happening..
|
And I ask again, if Oil was what George Bush, the 41st president of the United States, was after, why didn't we finish the job in 1991? Why wasn't the oil taken at that point? Why leave Saddam Hussein in power for those 12 years? Let's face it, there was nothing standing between the US troops in 1991 and Baghdad. There is also no evidence (only innuendo) that the current President Bush was pursuing anything other than the theat of Saddam Hussein. John Kerry himeslf called Saddam Hussein a threat and stated that disarming Saddam Hussein was of the utmost importance. John Kerry has also said (In July or August of this year), that knowing what he knows now, he would still have gone into Iraq. The oil as a goal simply doesn't mesh with the actions that have been taken, neither does revenge.
-- Jeff