Quote:
|
Originally Posted by fatboy
Huh?
SwamP-ThinG wrote this:
"These are the facts, no matter from wich side you look at them:
-40 were dead, including many women and many children=fact"
To which I replied:
"So? There are dead women and children all over the world right now. Is that the fault of the US too?"
To which you replied:
"The US didn't kill all the women and children all over the world. But it has admitted that these 40 people in question died in an attack made by the US military. So no point making such exaggerations."
And you're asking me if you mentioned children in your post?
1) You did
2) If you're referencing the second part of your post ("40 people in question"), the prior discussion includes children, if you intended on excluding them then you should've stated so.
Yet SwamP-ThinG's post (the post I replied to, which prompted your reply) claims this as a fact. Are you helping me prove my point? If so, why not address your reply to SwamP-ThinG?
But they just left them there in order to bolster Iraqi claims that it was a wedding and to further inflame the Arab world?
|
Oh, I'm sorry, I did mention the word children in my post. But I didn't mention anything about the US military killing children. If I would've ment to say so, I would've clearly stated so. If me not specifically excluding things from my sentences confuses you then it's not my problem. Just read what I post, don't assume I mean things that are not written.
And the subject of the thread and the main discussion is about the whole incident, not just the children you and SwamP_ThinG are arguing about. All of the prior discussion don't include children.