View Single Post
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 05-23-2004, 11:43 AM
fatboy fatboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 437
Rep Power: 255
fatboy is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phunkie
I didn't mention any children in my post, did I?
Huh?

SwamP-ThinG wrote this:
"These are the facts, no matter from wich side you look at them:
-40 were dead, including many women and many children=fact"

To which I replied:
"So? There are dead women and children all over the world right now. Is that the fault of the US too?"

To which you replied:
"The US didn't kill all the women and children all over the world. But it has admitted that these 40 people in question died in an attack made by the US military. So no point making such exaggerations."

And you're asking me if you mentioned children in your post?

1) You did
2) If you're referencing the second part of your post ("40 people in question"), the prior discussion includes children, if you intended on excluding them then you should've stated so.
Quote:
And the US military says there were no children, eyewitnesses say there were. People can decide which side to believe.
Yet SwamP-ThinG's post (the post I replied to, which prompted your reply) claims this as a fact. Are you helping me prove my point? If so, why not address your reply to SwamP-ThinG?
Quote:
Anything is possible.
But they just left them there in order to bolster Iraqi claims that it was a wedding and to further inflame the Arab world?
__________________
In this country, we don't need reasons to make things legal; we need reasons to make things illegal. - Startup
Reply With Quote