View Single Post
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-2004, 10:50 AM
fatboy fatboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 437
Rep Power: 255
fatboy is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phunkie
You didn't answer. Would you?

And 99,99% is good enough for me, of course you have to be sure about the person's guilt. 75% probability is not enough anymore for me to kill someone. But we are talking about beating someone, not killing.

We can all talk, but if you would get in a situation where you could save your family by beating someone up, I seriously think that everyone of us here would do it.
This is an interesting line of thought. So, you're saying that if you were 99.9% sure of a person's guilt, torture is okay. What about the possibility that he/she may die? Would that be okay too? How certain would you need to be? Would it matter if only a few others believed as you did? Would you go ahead with the torture if there were some dissention?
__________________
In this country, we don't need reasons to make things legal; we need reasons to make things illegal. - Startup
Reply With Quote