Quote:
|
Originally Posted by NHØP
The best definition of this I've seen came from a former member of the old SR boards. He said that being a freedom fighter doesen't necessarily exclude one from the use of terroristic tactics. (ie, targeting of civilians) Can't one be both a terrorist and a freedom fighter at the same time?
|
I don't see how you can fight an oppressor by bombing civilians.
Being a freedom fighter doesn't exclude the use of "cheap" tactics (like laying bombs), but if you don't target the enemy anymore but civilians instead, you're a terrorist.