Quote:
|
Originally Posted by yankeefan1970
I don't say things like this very often, but F. YOU! Am I not allowed to have an oppinion on the matter without someone questioning my grasp of reality? Have YOU checked your own reality lately?
|
I don't say it very often, either, but fuck you back. I've read your posts. You're just another one of those brainless Republican/Bush apologists. Another clueless mouth-breather with a blank, vacuous stare, and an incredibly gullible mind.
Quote:
|
Everyone else seems to have entirely written off the possibility.
|
And so should you. Think about it. Think real hard.
Quote:
|
You have absolute proof of this? Can you, without a doubt, state that Saddam did not have any WMD or the capabilities to produce them?
|
Can you prove he did? Lacking
any proof to the contrary, what exactly is it that you actually believe in again?
Quote:
When you say "supposed WMD programs", would that include things like the gas he used to kill all those Kurds to the north? Perhaps I'm entirely mistaken about the source of what caused all those deaths. Accoriding to the way you're thinking, those people must have simply died from some other kind of natural phenomenon . :fart:
Yeah, I'm certain now. Those people didn't die because Saddam used Mustard gas and other nerve agents on them. He didn't posses any WMD did he? No... Someone in the village simply had too many beans for dinner and killed off several hundred thousand with the aftereffects.
|
Anybody can make that stuff these days. You can make it in any high school chemistry lab, for god's sake. Kids can do it. Every country on the planet has the stuff. Nobody even really seriously considers chemical weapons to even be "WMD's" anymore, these days, it's so easy to make and so commonly possessed by so many nations all over the globe. Should we attack them ALL then, do you think?
Saddams little supply was just some old leftover stuff the US's CIA probably gave to him to use on the Iranians years before, when we were "allies" with Saddam. So maybe the world should attack the US for having it too (in fact more of it than anybody else) and because our own "very bad men" like Bush Sr. have been known to have distributed it to other madmen (like Saddam himself) in the past?
Quote:
When are you people going to wake up to the possibility that Saddam might have actually been the bad person he's made out to be? I know it would mean admitting that you're wrong and that Bush actually is doing something to help the world. But atleast it's better to realize that there just might be something more to this than what you've convinced yourselves of! Good God! Open your eyes  and open your minds!
|
Might have been???
MIGHT have been??? My God! That's really a
great reason to go to war...he
might have had some WMD's, or he
might have been a very bad guy! Christ on a crutch! Who is out of touch with reality here?
Bush
might be trying to take over the entire world, too, one piece at a time! People everywhere had better attack us right now -- we
might be planning to take over the entire planet with all our many WMD's!
Bush is a dickhead. An idiot. An inbred. A religious nut case. A fool.
If you believe his shit then so are you.
The world is FULL of "very bad men". It always has been; nothing new there! Many (if not most) are every bit as bad or even worse than Saddam was. So what? Why stop with just Saddam when there are so many other very bad men still available to choose from? Lets kill them all -- everybody that doesn't think like us, or agree with us! Lets just kill them all and just let God sort them out, hey? They "might" be dangerous to our way of life. Best not take ANY chances, hey?
Bush is the biggest liar and the most dangerous maniac to ever sit in the Oval Office. Wake up, fool.