Exactly. Invading where? Wich country? How can one country be blamed for the acts of an international organization? Would this mean invading every nation that has one of its citizens working for Al-Qaeda? How many nations would that imply? Not to mention that the US is also on that list.
Itīs no secret that Al-Qaeda wants to get their hands on a nuke, real bad. But itīs also true that Al-Qaeda is a master of deception, and the simple mention of a possible nuke on their hands causes immediate panic, wich is exactlly what they want.
Instead of speculating wether they have it or not, it would be wiser to track down the existing devices and determine wether any of such device has been "lost". There canīt be all that many suitcase nukes arounds. Only a handfull of countries have the ability to build one.
Despite what you might think, Fatboy, i do think something should be done. But what exactlly is where we differ.
The US has already invaded Afghanistan, and that produced no results at all. The US invaded Iraq, and again no results at all. Do you think the US should go on invading nation after nation, hoping to strike gold along the way?
Yeah, right...
